About Us

 

“Fairness is what justice really is.”

Potter Stewart

 

The firm is a Martindale-Hubbel AV Preeminent rated firm with over 40 years of combined legal experience. The attorneys at Weiss & Zaman have built their practice based on their exceptional results and integrity representing their clients. Weiss & Zaman has large firm capabilities coupled with a boutique firm efficiency and attentiveness to deliver superior legal representation for all of our clients.

about us
about us
about us

Unparalleled Work Ethic

We work tirelessly to immerse ourselves in our client’s lives and their businesses, to be responsive to their needs, and to fully understand the context of their legal issues. Our clients know that our every decision is informed by our desire to best serve their needs.

Excellence In The Practice Of Law

We are known for excellence in the practice of law and are committed to providing only the best quality of legal representation to our clients. This firm represents each client with a passion and drive for success, we combine a respect for the law with a forward-thinking emphasis on ideas that lead to successful representation.

Solutions To Your Problems

We strive everyday for exceptional creativity and the problem solving ability of our lawyers to find solutions to our clients complex legal issues. Integrity, mutual respect, communication, and a strive for victory is our firms key to success in delivering exceptional work.

Trust And Respect By Our Clients And Peers

As a successful firm with an ever- growing client base, we have earned the trust of our peers and colleagues in the legal profession who often refer clients to us. We form long-term relationships with our clients, who trust us to handle all of the legal issues they encounter in their lives. These relationships position us to approach cases with understanding of their context, leading to more effective strategies and desirable results.

Selected Cases

  • Waffer Internat. Corp. v. Khorsandi (1999) 69 Cal. App. 4th 1261
  • Sunshine Health Systems v. Bowen (9th Cir., 1987) 809 F.2d 1390
  • School District of Okaloosa County v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County
  • (1997) 58 Cal. App. 4th 1126
  • Ridgecrest Reg’l Hosp. v. Douglas, 2016 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2458
  • Nicholas Laboratories, LLC v. Chen (2011) 199 Cal. App. 4th 1240
  • Hi-Desert Medical Center v. Douglas (2015) 239 Cal. App. 4th 717
  • Bailey v. Assil (In re Bailey) (9th Circuit, BAP) 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 5084
  • Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. Levy (1984) 743 F.2d 722
  • Orden v. Crawshaw Mortgage & Investment Co. (1980) 109 Cal. App. 3d 141
  • Virtual Fonlink, Inc. V. Bailey (9th Cir., 2005) 164 Fed. Appx. 606
  • Afif v. Loyola Marymount Uni., Nov. 16, 2004 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 10475
  • Hughes v. DeRoy, Sept. 26, 2007 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7788
  • Comora v. Comprehensive Care Corp. (1983) 140 Cal.App.3d 369
  • Kavanaugh (Ryan) v. Sitrick (Michael), Sept. 10, 2010 Cal. Unpub. LEXIS 11074

CONTACT US FOR A CASE EVALUATION

Address: 16633 Ventura Blvd., Suite #510, Encino, CA 91436
Telephone: 818-290-3810      Facsimile: 818-290-3870